In summary: upon ingestion (or very shortly after) the beer (bottle and liquid) would disappear including the liquid inside the body. Stomach acid does exactly that as part of digestion. Think of it this way, if you took that beer and dipped it into acid, would you count that as damage? I would say yes. In short, beer doesn't stay beer long once ingested. As soon as the beer enters the body it starts getting broken down by various processes and chemicals in the body. Not to dive too deeply, but digestion is a destructive process. Unfortunately, drinking the beer would likely count as damaging it, so the beer would instantly vanish upon the attempt. The rest of this answer assumes that your DM allows you to create beer with Minor Conjuration for whatever reason. The beer would disappear upon being drunk See this question (among others) for examples of this argument more in depth.Īssuming your DM agrees, then you can't create beer in the first place.īut even if they do rule that beer can be created, it still wouldn't work to get you drunk. The argument could be made that you couldn't even create a beer in the first place since it doesn't really meet the definition of a single discreet object.
Minor conjuration works to create a small object. Limitations on the Conjurer's Minor Conjuration abilityĬan "Minor Conjuration" be used as often as a wizard wants?įake brews: They won't get you drunk Liquids generally aren't considered valid objects, so you can't even make beer If you can clarify, that would be very helpful. However, I can't find anything to back up my interpretation (nor his). And drinking a substance would move it (not destroy it) and change the beer's chemical properties once the body takes them in, so the original object can't disappear anymore when I cast Minor Conjuration again after he drank the first one. Meaning, drinking a conjured beer would look visibly magical but other than that, it would behave like a real beer. The class feature does what it says it does, and nothing more. Would that poison still work if I conjure something else, after injection of mentioned poison.
The same answer could be applied if I would conjure a poison for someone else instead, for example. In other words, could the dwarf get physically drunk on conjured beers? Placebo is sort of a way, but I'm mostly interested in whether the substance actually has enough time to influence a body. Or will the interpretation of such wording always be at DM's discretion? Question I'm still curious though if someone can give me a clear answer on this question, on how it's written to work. I'm happy with this interpretation, and it led to some fun times. The dwarf would fully believe it works though, due to the Placebo effect.
The DM ruled that the dwarf could drink countless conjured (though tasteless) beers but would never get drunk for it, since the toxins that create that mental state also leave his body whenever I conjure another one. "So do you count drinking it as damaging the object? And what does 'disappearing' mean to you?" Interpretation The object disappears after 1 hour, when you use this feature again, The DM asked me, "is this an illusion?" I said, "No, the real deal but it's visibly magical." DM, laughing: *" Does the fluid disappear after consumption?" Me, quoting the feature: Every six seconds I would do the same thing, and he would chug it, offering our bulky frontliner a cycle of countless beers. In our game my wizard frequently casts Minor Conjuration to create a beer (in a mug) for our dwarf barbarian, as a friendly gesture.
0 kommentar(er)
